#Tsearch moscow company update#
#Tsearch moscow company license#

OBSHCHESTVO S OGRANICHENNOY OTVETSTVENNOSTYU UPRAVLYAYUSHCHAYA KOMPANIYA RVK a.k.a. Target Type State-Owned Enterprise Tax ID No. Website Organization Established Date Organization Type: Trusts, funds and similar financial entities Target Type Financial Institution alt. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MANAGEMENT COMPANY OF RDIF f.k.a. AKTSIONERNOYE OBSHCHESTVO UPRAVLYAYUSHCHAYA KOMPANIYA ROSSIYSKOGO FONDA PRYAMYKH INVESTITSIY f.k.a. AKTSIONERNOE OBSHCHESTVO UPRAVLYAYUSHCHAYA KOMPANIYA ROSSISKOGO FONDA PRYAMYKH INVESTITSI a.k.a. The following entities have been added to OFAC's SDN List: DMITRIYEV, Kirill), Moscow, Russia DOB POB Kyiv, Ukraine nationality Russia Gender Male Tax ID No.

#Tsearch moscow company update#

The following names have been added to OFAC's list of Specially Designated Nationals list (SDN List) or have been updated on OFAC's Non-SDN Menu Based Sanctions List pursuant to Executive Order 14024, Directive 4: SPECIALLY DESIGNATED NATIONALS LIST UPDATE The following individual has been added to OFAC's SDN List:ĭMITRIEV, Kirill Aleksandrovich (Cyrillic: ДМИТРИЕВ, Кирилл Александрович) (a.k.a.

#Tsearch moscow company license#

None of them had ever been accused of any wrongdoing.The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is issuing Russia-related Directive 4 under Executive Order 14024 and Russia-related General License 8A. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of 10 American citizens and a lawful permanent resident who all had their electronic devices searched by border agents when they returned from trips abroad. Last year, the ACLU filed a federal lawsuit claiming warrantless border searches are unconstitutional because of the vast amount of private personal and business information stored on electronic devices. Reasonable suspicion is a lower legal standard.Ĭlaire Gastanaga, the executive director of the ACLU of Virginia, said the group was pleased that the appeals court “recognized correctly that border agents can’t conduct invasive searches on a traveler’s cellphone or other electronic devices just because the person is crossing the border”. The 4th circuit said it did not have to reach the question of whether probable cause or a warrant is required. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) had urged the 4th circuit to find that the government should be required to obtain a warrant or at least a determination of probable cause that evidence of a crime is contained on electronic devices before agents can search them at airports. But courts have made an exception for searches at airports and US ports of entry, finding that the government can conduct warrantless border searches to protect national security, prevent transnational crime and enforce immigration and customs laws. The fourth amendment requires law enforcement officers to obtain warrants based on probable cause.